Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/ia64 roadmap

On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 02:13:00PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > Some random ideas. I hope they will help starting discussions.
> > 
> >         * NUMA emu (something like Linux x86_64 NUMA_EMU)
> >           This would be convenient for developing NUMA support on
> >           non-NUMA box.
> 
>    I like this idea, at least as a development feature.

As a development feature, another approach would be that enhancing
VTi domain and using nested Xen.

> >         * performance isolation
> 
>    Can you describe what you mean by this?

It was too vague.
What I'm having in mind is IO performance isolation.
Currently guest domain might be able to interfare with other domains
IO performance.
One promising approach is direct attaching hardware device to guest domain
using IOMMU or other tricks.

Another software based approach is limiting performance. 
For example, limiting disk io performance.
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-07/msg00863.html
However his proposal seems to be discarded.
Is there other way? How about network?

thanks,
-- 
yamahata

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH 0/23] [RFC] VTi domain save/restore, Isaku Yamahata

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/ia64 roadmap, Jun Kamada

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/ia64 roadmap, Alex Williamson

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/ia64 roadmap, Tristan Gingold

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]