WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [patch 06/16] Kexec/Kdump: honour non-zero crashker

To: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [patch 06/16] Kexec/Kdump: honour non-zero crashkernel offset
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:34:21 -0600
Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:35:10 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070919030346.GB4722@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: HP OSLO R&D
References: <20070912082834.175658477@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070912083044.855938929@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189633111.6287.31.camel@lappy> <20070919030346.GB4722@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 12:03 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 03:38:31PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > 
> >    I don't understand why we want this change in our kernel.  Its
> > changing code within #ifndef CONFIG_XEN.  Should this just be fixed
> > upstream and we'll absorb it at the next merge up?  thanks,
> 
> This change is a backport of a change that has already been committed to
> Linus' tree. I believe it was included in 2.6.22, possibly before. I can
> just drop this change from my patchset if you like. However, I think
> that it makes sense to keep it in given that a backport of ia64 kexec is
> included in this series, and this change is really just part of that.

   Ok, I'm sure we'll be able to figure it out or come bug you about it
on the next re-base.  Let's keep it if you think it makes things more
organized.  Thanks,

        Alex

-- 
Alex Williamson                             HP Open Source & Linux Org.


_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>