Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch 4/4] [RFC] Xwindow: Modify pci_acpi_

Hi Yamahata-san,

On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:07:28 +0900
Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 07:19:08PM +0900, Jun Kamada wrote:
> > On my test environment, 231 hypercalls were issued with no optimization.
> > On the other hand, number of hypercalls ware reduced to 25 with the
> > optimization.
> > 
> > It seems that the optimization provides significant effect, maybe. Could
> > you give us any comment?
> 
> The optimization seems to make sense.
> Then, Does it make difference for the optimization
> to be aware of PAGE_SIZE?

Could you explain more about the PAGE_SIZE optimization?

Current code merges overlapped address ranges without awareness of
PAGE_SIZE and page alignment. Merged address range should
be divided by PAGE_SIZE?

Thanks,

-----
Jun Kamada
Virtual Systems Development Div.
Platform Technology Development Unit
Fujitsu Ltd.
kama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx



_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

[Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [patch] set paddr bits to 48, Alex Williamson

Next by Date:

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#15162, Yang, Liuqing

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch 4/4] [RFC] Xwindow: Modify pci_acpi_scan_root(), Isaku Yamahata

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch 4/4] [RFC] Xwindow: Modify pci_acpi_scan_root(), Isaku Yamahata

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]