WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] Modify for compiling PV-on-HVM and followin

To: Doi.Tsunehisa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] Modify for compiling PV-on-HVM and following callback_via
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 23:14:09 -0700
Cc: xen-ia64-devel <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 22:13:29 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200702060325.l163PmX09791@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: HP OSLO R&D
References: <45C6BF26.2060107@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1170715895.20903.29.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200702060325.l163PmX09791@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 12:25 +0900, Doi.Tsunehisa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> 
> You (alex.williamson) said:
> >> --- a/xen/include/public/arch-ia64.h    Mon Feb 05 13:19:10 2007 +0900
> >> +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-ia64.h    Mon Feb 05 13:20:48 2007 +0900
> >> @@ -64,9 +64,11 @@ DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_pfn_t);
> >>  #define VIRQ_MCA_CMC    VIRQ_ARCH_1 /* MCA cmc interrupt */
> >>  #define VIRQ_MCA_CPE    VIRQ_ARCH_2 /* MCA cpe interrupt */
> >>  
> >> +#if 0
> >>  /* Arch specific callback irq definition */
> >>  /* using Requester-ID(RID) as callback irq */
> >>  #define IA64_CALLBACK_IRQ_RID        (1 << 31)
> >> +#endif
> > 
> >    Is this ever going to be defined?  If not, I'd rather see it deleted
> > along with the associated code.  Thanks,
> 
>   I'm waving to decide it.
> 
>   I think that we should delete the definition for the future, but
> we'll have to keep it for backward compatibility.
> 
>   This spec is not included in any release version, thus we should
> select to delete it, I think.
> 
>   What do you think about this ?

   IMHO, if it's #if 0'd out, it's not really adding to backwards
compatibility anyway.  This wasn't in 3.0.4, so I think we should
probably drop it.  Thanks,

        Alex

-- 
Alex Williamson                             HP Open Source & Linux Org.


_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel