WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] Modify for compiling PV-on-HVM and followin

To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] Modify for compiling PV-on-HVM and following callback_via
From: Doi.Tsunehisa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 12:25:47 +0900
Cc: xen-ia64-devel <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 19:25:39 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 05 Feb 2007 15:51:34 -0700. <1170715895.20903.29.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <45C6BF26.2060107@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><1170715895.20903.29.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Alex,

You (alex.williamson) said:
>> --- a/xen/include/public/arch-ia64.h    Mon Feb 05 13:19:10 2007 +0900
>> +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-ia64.h    Mon Feb 05 13:20:48 2007 +0900
>> @@ -64,9 +64,11 @@ DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_pfn_t);
>>  #define VIRQ_MCA_CMC    VIRQ_ARCH_1 /* MCA cmc interrupt */
>>  #define VIRQ_MCA_CPE    VIRQ_ARCH_2 /* MCA cpe interrupt */
>>  
>> +#if 0
>>  /* Arch specific callback irq definition */
>>  /* using Requester-ID(RID) as callback irq */
>>  #define IA64_CALLBACK_IRQ_RID        (1 << 31)
>> +#endif
> 
>    Is this ever going to be defined?  If not, I'd rather see it deleted
> along with the associated code.  Thanks,

  I'm waving to decide it.

  I think that we should delete the definition for the future, but
we'll have to keep it for backward compatibility.

  This spec is not included in any release version, thus we should
select to delete it, I think.

  What do you think about this ?

Thanks,
- Tsunehisa Doi

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel