WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] xen-ia64-unstable merge

To: "Isaku Yamahata" <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] xen-ia64-unstable merge
From: "You, Yongkang" <yongkang.you@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:07:34 +0800
Cc: xen-ia64-devel <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 01:08:08 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AccC07uuYzVJPefcR/iM92e0IU1dKAAQSaEg
Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] xen-ia64-unstable merge
Hi Alex and Isaku,

I have tried VTI using Alex merged tree 
(http://free.linux.hp.com/~awilliam/xen-ia64-merge/)

When I tried to create VTI domain, the Xen0 crash and whole system rebooted. 
The logs are:
-----------------------
(XEN) tlb_track_allocate_entries:69 allocated 256 num_entries 256 num_free 256
(XEN) tlb_track_create:115 hash 0xf0000001b90e4000 hash_size 512
(XEN) ### domain f000000007c14080: rid=80000-c0000 mp_rid=2000
(XEN) arch_domain_create: domain=f000000007c14080
(XEN) domain.c:423: arch_domain_create:423 domain 2 pervcpu_vhpt 1
(XEN) tlb_track_allocate_entries:69 allocated 256 num_entries 256 num_free 256
(XEN) tlb_track_create:115 hash 0xf0000001b9318000 hash_size 512
(XEN) ### domain f000000007c14080: rid=80000-c0000 mp_rid=2000
(XEN) arch_domain_create: domain=f000000007c14080
(XEN) BUG at mm.c:862
(XEN) FIXME: implement ia64 dump_execution_state()
(XEN)
(XEN) ****************************************
(XEN) Panic on CPU 0:
(XEN) BUG at mm.c:862
(XEN) ****************************************
(XEN)
(XEN) Reboot in five seconds...

Best Regards,
Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康

>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Isaku
>Yamahata
>Sent: 2006年11月8日 9:17
>To: Alex Williamson
>Cc: xen-ia64-devel
>Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] xen-ia64-unstable merge
>
>
>On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 05:17:44PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>>    The xen-unstable.hg tree has been very busy lately, and unfortunately
>> has broken a few things for ia64.  I'm still having a few problems
>> getting paravirtualized domains to boot due to changes in xend.  These
>> patches need to be fixed/accounted for in the ia64 support code:
>>
>> http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg?cs=e6fdb32b786c
>> http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg?cs=4a320d26fc24
>>
>> I proposed a patch for the latter cset here:
>>
>>
>http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-ia64-devel/2006-11/msg00030.ht
>ml
>>
>> I think it's still correct, but doesn't address the domain memory
>> allocation changes of the first cset.
>
>The patch of cs=4a320d26fc24 changed initrd loading semantics
>so that initrd->len isn't initialized.
>The attached patch addresses the patch of cs=4a320d26fc24,
>however it doesn't address cs=e6fdb32b786c.
>
>
>>    To expedite catching up with xen-unstable.hg and getting everything
>> working, I've temporarily exported my merge tree here:
>>
>> http://free.linux.hp.com/~awilliam/xen-ia64-merge/
>>
>> Please take a look and let me know if you have suggestions or
>> (preferably) patches to get paravirtualized domains working.
>
>> I have not
>> yet tested VTi domains on this tree.  Thanks,
>
>I suppose that VTi domain is also broken.
>http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg?cs=cf3d69ba5633
>
>--
>yamahata

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>