|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-ia64-devel
[Xen-ia64-devel] Re: blkbk/netbk modules fail to load on fedora	xen/ia64
 
| 
To:  | 
Aron Griffis <aron@xxxxxx>, xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
Subject:  | 
[Xen-ia64-devel] Re: blkbk/netbk modules fail to load on fedora	xen/ia64 | 
 
| 
From:  | 
Akio Takebe <takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Date:  | 
Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:32:29 +0900 | 
 
| 
Cc:  | 
fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx, jean-paul.pigache@xxxxxxxx, "Silbermann,	Martine" <martine.silbermann@xxxxxx>,	ia64 Fedora Core Development <fedora-ia64-list@xxxxxxxxxx>,	David Cardos <david.cardos@xxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Delivery-date:  | 
Fri, 22 Sep 2006 02:33:20 -0700 | 
 
| 
Envelope-to:  | 
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
In-reply-to:  | 
<20060922022456.GA13132@xxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
List-help:  | 
<mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> | 
 
| 
List-id:  | 
Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen	<xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-post:  | 
<mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-subscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>,	<mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> | 
 
| 
List-unsubscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>,	<mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> | 
 
| 
References:  | 
<20060922011305.GA28162@xxxxxxxxx>	<7AC6DDE9DEC138takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<20060922022456.GA13132@xxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Sender:  | 
xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
 
 
Hi, Aron and all
>> We may have to change dom0_mem of FC6 default to 1GB.
>> But I think the best fix is (1) statically link the modules.
>> (Because all kernel-xen need blkbk/netbk and xenblk/net. 
>> ide module is also static link. And because xen community member
>> test the statically linked modules, I think the statically linked
>> modules is stabler than the dynamic linked modlues.)
>
>I don't mind asking RH to statically link the modules if there is good
>reason.  However I don't understand why it is needed.  512M is a lot
>of memory!  How can it be filled to the extent that the blkbk/netbk
>modules won't load?  What are their requirements?
>
Please see the following error message.
    FATAL: Error inserting blkbk
    (/lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2566.fc6xen/kernel/drivers/xen/
    blkback/blkbk.ko): Cannot allocate memory
    modprobe: page allocation failure. order:8, mode:0xd0
blkbk.ko request order8 pages in blkif_init().
order8 pages is very big.
page_alloc() probably fail when it is requested order8 pages,
because page_alloc() must return contiguos pages.
Especially after boot and terminate some processes,
page_alloc() is hard to allocate order8 pages.
So when dom0_mem=1G, page_allo() is easier to allocate them 
than dom0_mem=512M.
And when statically linked modules, page_alloc() is the easest 
to allocate them.
I think implementation of blk/netbk.ko is not good.
But I think statically linked modules is the best solution in your 
solutions.
And I think this issue is happened in the case of not only ia64,
but also x86.
(In the case of x86, default size of dom0_mem is physcal memory size.
So this issue is hard to be happened.)
Please commets.
FYI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202971
Best Regards,
Akio Takebe
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
 |   
 
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |