WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

RE: [PATCH][RESEND] RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Add support to physdev_

To: "Tristan Gingold" <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>, "Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [PATCH][RESEND] RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Add support to physdev_ops
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:46:44 +0800
Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:47:05 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcZlF2aB69Dre5ZlRUa2yfjiZMEJ8wAAApBg
Thread-topic: [PATCH][RESEND] RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Add support to physdev_ops
>From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2006年4月21日 15:48
>> >> >> >Sent: 2006年4月21日 15:01
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Le Vendredi 21 Avril 2006 05:29, Tian, Kevin a écrit :
>> >> >> >Just a comment: why LID is not virtualized?
>> >> >> >This is required as soon as we want to do VCPU migration!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Yes, LID needs to be virtualized. Shouldn't that be included in
>> >> >> your guest SMP patch?
>> >> >
>> >> >LID is not currently virtualized on dom0 because of IOSAPIC.
>> >> >LID is virtualized on domU.
>> >>
>> >> Not sure why IOSAPIC makes difference to dom0/domU. Could
>> >> you elaborate?
>> >
>> >DomU has no IOSAPIC!
>>
>> OK, do you mean that LID can't be virtualized before this patch
>> where dom0 owns IOSAPIC and thus must have to know physical
>> LID? If that's case, after this patch is accepted in, you can add same
>> logic into dom0.
>I really think it is better if you provide complete patch.
>

No, I don't want to include too much unrelated stuff into one 
self-contained patch. Current patch is already complete per its 
current purpose.

>My previous VIOSAPIC patch virtualized LID.

That can be added easily as a separate patch later.

Thanks,
Kevin

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel