|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Enable hash vtlb
>Could be, but your numbers raise questions about your
>measurement methodology. Why
>is domU faster than native (with or without the patch)?
Didn't you know kernel build on DomU is faster than native?
I remember Fujitsu has post this kind of data, and I also got
this kind of data from Intel QA team.
I have suspected this data too.
After further thought, I think the main reason is
the services running on domU is less than those on native machine,
for example, all network-related services are not running on domU.
You can get this kind of data yourself. :-)
Thanks,
Anthony
>And why is domU much faster than the previous numbers
>you posted for dom0 (with or without the patch)?
>I've never seen either of these to be true.
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Enable hash vtlb, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Enable hash vtlb, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Enable hash vtlb, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Enable hash vtlb, Yang, Fred
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Enable hash vtlb, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Enable hash vtlb, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Enable hash vtlb, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Enable hash vtlb,
Xu, Anthony <=
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Enable hash vtlb, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Enable hash vtlb, Yang, Fred
|
|
|
|
|