WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: PATCH: PAL_VM_SUMMARY and PAL_VM_INFO

To: "Williamson, Alex (Linux Kernel Dev)" <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: PATCH: PAL_VM_SUMMARY and PAL_VM_INFO
From: "Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 13:25:49 -0700
Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Tristan Gingold <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 13:26:36 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcZZtYUJIsBye+zsTgqktb4WFrDKswAApNDQ
Thread-topic: PATCH: PAL_VM_SUMMARY and PAL_VM_INFO
> From: Williamson, Alex (Linux Kernel Dev) 
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 2:06 PM
> To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
> Cc: Tristan Gingold; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: PATCH: PAL_VM_SUMMARY and PAL_VM_INFO
> 
> On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 09:30 -0700, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort
> Collins) wrote:
> 
> > max_pkr should probably be zero for now (at least non-VT) since
> > pkr's are not implemented.  Or would this be an "illegal" value
> > because of architectural definition.
> 
>   Looks like that could be considered illegal, the SDM says 
> there are at
> least 16 PKRs.

Given that PKRs are currently unimplemented, returning
an illegal value (0) might be the right thing anyway.

Dan

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>