|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: PATCH: PAL_VM_SUMMARY and PAL_VM_INFO
> From: Williamson, Alex (Linux Kernel Dev)
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 2:06 PM
> To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
> Cc: Tristan Gingold; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: PATCH: PAL_VM_SUMMARY and PAL_VM_INFO
>
> On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 09:30 -0700, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort
> Collins) wrote:
>
> > max_pkr should probably be zero for now (at least non-VT) since
> > pkr's are not implemented. Or would this be an "illegal" value
> > because of architectural definition.
>
> Looks like that could be considered illegal, the SDM says
> there are at
> least 16 PKRs.
Given that PKRs are currently unimplemented, returning
an illegal value (0) might be the right thing anyway.
Dan
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
|
|
|
|