|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/6] eliminate cpu_set()
>>> On 07.11.11 at 15:31, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/11/2011 09:57, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>
> I don't like set_cpu_{present,online} taking a boolean clear/set flag. There
> is no caller that can both set and clear a flag, so it is always hardcoded
> as 0 or 1. And then the reader has to make a (probably not hard) guess what
> that means.
>
> If you must add an abstraction interface here, better to define four of
> them: {set,clear}_cpu_{present,online}.
Hmm, I don't like this interface design too much either, but again wanted
to follow Linux rather than cooking our own. Do you really want us to
diverge in this respect?
Jan
> Apart from this, all patches are:
> Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
>
> -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|