WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen 4.1.2 - when ?

To: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen 4.1.2 - when ?
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:16:28 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:11:15 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CA703979.30771%keir@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CA703979.30771%keir@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 16/08/2011 14:26, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >>>> On 12.08.11 at 17:51, Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> We should consider doing a first RC for it asap. Does anyone have anything
> >> specific to be backported that hasn't already been done? E.g., toolstack
> >> stuff, Ian?
> > 
> > Given 
> > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-08/msg00205.html,
> > it should also be considered to revert 23092:0f2b9b6c5a74 (which I
> > unintentionally reverted in -unstable with 23573:584c2e5e03d9, for
> > which in turn I'm holding back the correction due to aforementioned
> > regression and the lack of a comment from Stefano).
> 
> The change will need to be re-validated through xen-unstable anyway. I'll
> revert it from 4.1-testing.
 
I think that reverting the commit is a good idea, see the email I have just 
sent to the thread "Re: hvm_domain_use_pirq() breaks device".

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>