| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl
|
To: |
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl |
|
From: |
Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:04:39 +0100 |
|
Cc: |
"Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 09 Aug 2011 10:05:57 -0700 |
|
Dkim-signature: |
v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sSdESjEepf4gMPGI22KgN4oakq2mRQ1FI2pVLkVkLHs=; b=axDwJC+PIqMBsHoSkwlpPSwok/4vcUlhjpUGGUhVeHAPRpzPq+VerBr9OEJVQl4Adk EsfoNVKlkbgM6xTigohYeZXNP12syF0KWjLkk/+Tw/gvtrfHPK5LP9sm0gjv356Rt29T m/poG4FZjwxQkSfPkuVLAbhSBhozWEfTL8We4= |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<20033.25653.745138.895887@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Thread-index: |
AcxWtmxsTCUoWbGqo0m1vE3DQtq5Ng== |
|
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-xl |
|
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/12.30.0.110427 |
On 09/08/2011 17:45, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Keir Fraser writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable bisection] complete
> test-amd64-i386-xl"):
>> Probably none of them. I suspect that exciting messages are de rigeur with
>> pv_ops (not really a criticism, just the fact that the dom0 support is still
>> perhaps a bit raw, and developed with an eye to upstreamability rather than
>> providing the ultimate in clean boot logs).
>
> Perhaps we should be reverting the erst patch at least, or maybe both
> patches, pending a fix ?
I'll revert the change to erst_check_table().
-- Keir
> Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home