Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH V3] AMD IOMMU: Fix an interrupt remapping issue

[George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Oops, n/m -- already in. :-)
 -G

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:37 AM, George Dunlap
<George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is this a candidate for backporting to 4.1?
>
>  -George
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On 11.04.11 at 12:31, Wei Wang2 <wei.wang2@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> This patch is the latest. Should have addressed all of your concerns. Please
>>> take a look.
>>
>> Looks good to me now. Assuming it also still addresses the problem
>> at hand:
>> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Thanks, Jan
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Wei
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.wang2@xxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> On Monday 11 April 2011 09:23:38 Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> >>> On 08.04.11 at 18:52, Wei Wang2 <wei.wang2@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Jan, How dose this one look like to you?
>>>>
>>>> Much better, but still not quite there: The unmasking must happen
>>>> *after* the writing of the upper half (if that's what is being modified).
>>>>
>>>> You could also skip the unmasking altogether if saved_mask == 1.
>>>>
>>>> And if you start using __io_apic_write() (which I find very desirable)
>>>> is there a reason not to use it (and __io_apic_read()) in all of the
>>>> other places you touch anyway, too?
>>>>
>>>> Jan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel