|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH V3] AMD IOMMU: Fix an interrupt remapping iss
Is this a candidate for backporting to 4.1?
-George
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On 11.04.11 at 12:31, Wei Wang2 <wei.wang2@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This patch is the latest. Should have addressed all of your concerns. Please
>> take a look.
>
> Looks good to me now. Assuming it also still addresses the problem
> at hand:
> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks, Jan
>
>> Thanks,
>> Wei
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.wang2@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> On Monday 11 April 2011 09:23:38 Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> >>> On 08.04.11 at 18:52, Wei Wang2 <wei.wang2@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Jan, How dose this one look like to you?
>>>
>>> Much better, but still not quite there: The unmasking must happen
>>> *after* the writing of the upper half (if that's what is being modified).
>>>
>>> You could also skip the unmasking altogether if saved_mask == 1.
>>>
>>> And if you start using __io_apic_write() (which I find very desirable)
>>> is there a reason not to use it (and __io_apic_read()) in all of the
>>> other places you touch anyway, too?
>>>
>>> Jan
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH V3] AMD IOMMU: Fix an interrupt remapping issue,
George Dunlap <=
|
|
|
|
|