WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/5] xen: Fix xen_enabled().

On 15.07.2011, at 16:32, Anthony Perard wrote:

> Use the "host" CONFIG_ define instead of the "target" one.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> hw/xen.h |    2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/xen.h b/hw/xen.h
> index e432705..43b95d6 100644
> --- a/hw/xen.h
> +++ b/hw/xen.h
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ extern int xen_allowed;
> 
> static inline int xen_enabled(void)
> {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_XEN
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_BACKEND

is there any way to get this one more clever? The current patch fixes it for 
your use case, sure, but I'd prefer that if you do:

  ./configure --enable-xen --target-list=alpha-softmmu

I'll get xen_enabled to be inline exterminated and not slow down the alpha 
target. How about something like

#ifdef CONFIG_NO_XEN
    return 0;
#elif defined(CONFIG_XEN_BACKEND)
    return xen_allowed;
#else
    return 0;
#endif

That way code that is compiled per-target won't get slowed down just because we 
have the xen option on.


Alex


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>