[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/5] exec.c: Use ram_addr_t in cpu_physical_memory_rw(...).

[Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 07/15/2011 04:32 PM, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> As the variable pd and addr1 inside the function cpu_physical_memory_rw
> are mean to handle a RAM address, they should be of the ram_addr_t type
> instead of unsigned long.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD<anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   exec.c |    4 ++--
>   1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
> index c0673c2..4220d45 100644
> --- a/exec.c
> +++ b/exec.c
> @@ -3858,7 +3858,7 @@ void cpu_physical_memory_rw(target_phys_addr_t addr, 
> uint8_t *buf,
>       uint8_t *ptr;
>       uint32_t val;
>       target_phys_addr_t page;
> -    unsigned long pd;
> +    ram_addr_t pd;
>       PhysPageDesc *p;
>
>       while (len>  0) {
> @@ -3898,7 +3898,7 @@ void cpu_physical_memory_rw(target_phys_addr_t addr, 
> uint8_t *buf,
>                       l = 1;
>                   }
>               } else {
> -                unsigned long addr1;
> +                ram_addr_t addr1;
>                   addr1 = (pd&  TARGET_PAGE_MASK) + (addr&  ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK);
>                   /* RAM case */
>                   ptr = qemu_get_ram_ptr(addr1);
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>

Paolo


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel