Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [xen-unstable test] 6413: regressions - FAIL

[Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 15/03/2011 09:56, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>>> On 15.03.11 at 10:47, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On 14.03.11 at 18:22, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Ian Jackson writes ("[xen-unstable test] 6413: regressions - FAIL"):
>>>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking:
>>>>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-win       5 xen-boot               fail REGR. vs. 6396
>>> 
>>> Xen boot crash.  Lots of these ...
>> 
>> Yes, I can see my thinko is c/s 23033:84bacd800bf8  (too bad all
>> my test systems either have ARAT or no MSI support in their HPETs).
>> I'm sorry for that and will send a fix soon.
>> 
>> Jan
>> 
>>> Mar 13 23:29:31.091587 (XEN) Brought up 8 CPUs
>>> Mar 13 23:29:31.205401 (XEN) Testing NMI watchdog --- CPU#0 okay. CPU#1
>>> stuck. 
>>> CPU#2 stuck. CPU#3 stuck. CPU#4 stuck. CPU#5 stuck. CPU#6 s
>>> tuck. CPU#7 stuck.
> 
> But I hope these aren't related, as I can't see how any recent
> change could have broken the watchdog NMI setup logic.

I think our NMI watchdog support is not working properly on all new CPUs,
and it's been that way for some time.

 -- Keir

> Jan
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel