On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 15:08 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 01:20:28PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 20:35 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 04:43:34PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > I don't think this was a deliberate ommision.
> > > >
> > > > Makes the tail end of this function look even more like
> > > > xen_bind_pirq_msi_to_irq.
> > >
> > > I sense a trend here .. :-)
> >
> > It's almost like I had an agenda :-)
>
> The force is strong with your agenda... so I put your patches in
> #stable/irq.cleanup and merged it in #linux-next.
Thanks.
> Was the question that Stefano had answered?
> Also tested on dom0, PV, PV+PCI, PVonHVM, PVonHVM+PCI with a 82576 and 82574
> Intel NIC.
Nice one, cheers!
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|