WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 71, Issue 85

To: domiel forty-two <domiel42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 71, Issue 85
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 07:08:05 +0000
Cc:
Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 23:08:50 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to :message-id:thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PkqP0Z/0By7T70amiutwEFL+mzkjvToZSRQQCVrPwh4=; b=AQu7/tXJm5JIItrXv8+lM4ZJIQROj9w4mMofLgnCJWw1iXTjJO2f/NY9RR80kftN8J hePPxrQt7I/1Obw13Ib1IqhQ5988/k22pdUyUDKahjSOB+PI+DqdLXw0Gji3p91kf1Wj 3vDsQxpg03ctMLrFXKwcVp7gvQ7rc0RCI7jgM=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=bdjJWyRH3hoDULRzoeO4CGyUoDiQHQVmxty+ZawQY7wkRYNQOoW/xBMzbdP0/T7ZiV f93XqMHzlsFBiUnyn1deb5YB5UBsfCC8/bCkXgHEJiF+0PlEWHjoLj7MskSvSTUg/Z7k hVrdsFuhDzrgWrCqee2GUYoGVQPDOzbhMKKLs=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <528111.91222.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcvPOpZ8TY+xnljplE+E07NLt/74Lw==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 71, Issue 85
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.28.0.101117
On 18/02/2011 02:44, "domiel forty-two" <domiel42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi all!
> 
> Did the nested xen stuff make it into the xen-unstable (4.1-rc1?) tree as
> suggested back in January by Tim Deegan?

Tim meant that the patches may be applied to xen-unstable after 4.1 is
branched from it. I.e., they are candidates for 4.2, not 4.1.

 -- Keir

> TIA
> 
> 
> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:01:12 +0000
> From: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/12] Nested Virtualization: Overview
> To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>,    "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
>     <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Dong,     Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <20110107160112.GC5651@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> At 16:02 +0000 on 20 Dec (1292860962), Christoph Egger wrote:
>> This patch series brings Nested Virtualization to Xen.
>> This is the seventh patch series.
> 
> Thanks for this.  I've commented on patch 4 (core) and patch 12
> (hap-on-hap) separately.  Also I think we need an Acked-by: from Eddie
> for patches 1-8. 
> 
> Apart from that I think we can check these in as soon as the 4.1
> branch has been taken, and fix up any remaining issues in-tree.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Tim.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>