WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 71, Issue 85

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 71, Issue 85
From: domiel forty-two <domiel42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:44:29 -0800 (PST)
Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:45:39 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com.au; s=s1024; t=1297997069; bh=W1ReVXm+5iH8b5QgiVz1Q6QTuOf9WbAeWXAkNGKzBco=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jIMOrKeJ+vMF58e3u0GOxzHD00kxKsk1vjYQe7NaBzO4fyETVrjbftGVnqP2xVWHp6qBsQrPTk2ENtAgh2UKst+Zj/vvfN5F/5hAKybQA9Uom34PC/VOV99q5dmBU8Mn5ovb5jZbvZxCArYDaBEC0FRQB6+abZ9aA+k/QwYQ9o8=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IIZiig/hD5esIWMD4Sj3VP1Ksmq+IRW0r+WuCB0F/u5svF0orYDmELoZsSzqVpxNAQOkDGyHIzngxdhQUPrfq0+JXbhiot5DgxZfmYUU6De7cHrVcJMUVGRETwetGTsUwKSfcb7n7YmnmGbgm6c4cxlw71Tj73qTAyxtzkfhBfs=;
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi all!

Did the nested xen stuff make it into the xen-unstable (4.1-rc1?) tree as suggested back in January by Tim Deegan?

TIA


Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:01:12 +0000
From: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/12] Nested Virtualization: Overview
To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>,    "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
    <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Dong,     Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <20110107160112.GC5651@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi,

At 16:02 +0000 on 20 Dec (1292860962), Christoph Egger wrote:
> This patch series brings Nested Virtualization to Xen.
> This is the seventh patch series.

Thanks for this.  I've commented on patch 4 (core) and patch 12
(hap-on-hap) separately.  Also I think we need an Acked-by: from Eddie
for patches 1-8.

Apart from that I think we can check these in as soon as the 4.1
branch has been taken, and fix up any remaining issues in-tree.

Cheers,

Tim.

--
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Principal Software Engineer, Xen Platform Team
Citrix Systems UK Ltd.  (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG)


 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>