WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] APIC error on CPU[x] in xcp dom0

To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] APIC error on CPU[x] in xcp dom0
From: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:07:38 +0000
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:09:19 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3URfUSLWAU2bXZcwkice0KKyaD7Fr+HKwe5z/NDEL7U=; b=tNROsDLjepoNqtI3rwdBGMej/p9+jyWNgh2OjUwfI7gYI+Cp0tziGZZR4Hr0oQOCjA d1E5AxIPYwrTVY6R8Yku5G2LGR3and6OL1A5yp0h8GjwGqz5rhLF+aXc2xv31Tk+6pIl 9dcQwxfOWP0nkRva4OXtJ+W9ieXQ14Ii39hqw=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=mY8eWgZ89BPpfe4JV2rdLpYBgzaByz7pE+PYsBsyFou4NV1GtRS6N7vNegfyq2vaih gxNdHmqTy0mkFFo9+/yQaFyK160Ocxp7/lzB8Rr2THhUunYat9wfY/OzsXupvCGt+O5m 8fpjNOWXbVeG8GAcXZsweIBaguceBlZpECy30=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <19776.12089.12569.256559@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AANLkTimTCfOCBHzjUBi=BR0su=OB6k087uEuOi8RgcWP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D3EC7DD020000780002E551@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTimyWAtGCoXgW0cuxrO6i6iD6X6HCK4AhK+cj3_y@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D3F05F2020000780002E691@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1296044366.10609.1358.camel@elijah> <19776.12089.12569.256559@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Seen again in flight 5506:
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/5506/test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-pair/info.html

 -George

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] APIC error on 
> CPU[x] in       xcp dom0"):
>> Then perhaps we should be testing the 2.6.32 kernel instead?  There was
>> a reason we were testing 2.6.27 instead of 2.6.32, but I don't remember
>> the details.
>
> I tried updating it, but the .32 xcp kernel failed a lot of the tests
> that the .27 one passed.  Since for the xen upstream tests I'm
> primarily using the xcp kernel as a baseline (to help differentiate
> xen vs dom0 pvops kernel bugs) it didn't seem very important to move
> up to .32.
>
> Ian.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] APIC error on CPU[x] in xcp dom0, George Dunlap <=