 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] xl block-attach
| To: | Kamala Narasimhan <kamala.narasimhan@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] xl block-attach |
| From: | Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:59:24 +0000 |
| Cc: | "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:01:07 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4D45C257.3060702@xxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Organization: | Citrix Systems, Inc. |
| References: | <4D45C257.3060702@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 19:56 +0000, Kamala Narasimhan wrote: > The format in which disk information is required in xl block-attach is > different > than the one expected in the disk configuration option (in the config file). > It > might make sense to keep the two consistent (excluding the domain/backend dom > id > additional param block-attach would require). Would it be alright if I > enforce > it in our implementation (in main_blockattach in xl_cmdimpl.c) and modify > block-attach help to reflect that change? I think it makes sense to have them be the same (or as similar as possible). OOI, do the xm block-attach and xm config syntaxes differ from each too? Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Comments on Xen bug 1732, Stefano Stabellini |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Hypervisor crash(!) on xl cpupool-numa-split, Andre Przywara |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] xl block-attach, Kamala Narasimhan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] xl block-attach, Kamala Narasimhan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
