 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] xl block-attach
| To: | "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] xl block-attach |
| From: | Kamala Narasimhan <kamala.narasimhan@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:56:07 -0500 |
| Delivery-date: | Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:57:19 -0800 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YpJ/PfyjVtThNsZzn7TFETZiKfXGf7aDuoAFpIvcqdA=; b=oqXco7PxPA3ImWA7tAvF7MlHxPGD9h9Wpzx55OpmCtRDKNpJajoRHcT4C5CrTcbyss 7aJ0ZgwKUa0GJf4rCnUCwkqatWPGjLxLbjzt79sUaoTIF5NVeNm01u+07dvfNoh23+A+ pnS0w8YJl/9mKD0Bf7Ojl6//imV1BoHnDhxXU= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Q763IuSIfC/ePSz+LpKbSiEa+oOmJT4MmnawUjSA1CrzatqsY6pEm9bf1OptaB+OFL m/ya8bkKFLAigfXQoJXMX/MvgsInIphilm5sqzxFOy6CvO84ijjWKC1xrYbgfTHFWEHl jZKR/reybaGvaWApEe1tbSLTu4aWdcjzybQAg= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101027) |
The format in which disk information is required in xl block-attach is different than the one expected in the disk configuration option (in the config file). It might make sense to keep the two consistent (excluding the domain/backend dom id additional param block-attach would require). Would it be alright if I enforce it in our implementation (in main_blockattach in xl_cmdimpl.c) and modify block-attach help to reflect that change? Kamala _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] Format for specifying backend/frontend info for block devices in xenstore, Kamala Narasimhan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] pygrub fails to read single partition with grub bootsector in 4.1.0-rc, M A Young |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Format for specifying backend/frontend info for block devices in xenstore, Kamala Narasimhan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] xl block-attach, Ian Campbell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
