WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen build - Debian vs Redhat layout patch options

To: Bruce Edge <bruce.edge@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen build - Debian vs Redhat layout patch options
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:42:22 +0000
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, user virtual <virtualusr@xxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:42:55 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AANLkTinesEv5ZgQ2cXVKbx19=ox23NhC5t-U31_1Eu9M@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AANLkTimi2-DzvysGnzJmEZtL4TXSsX6YDS0TPtoU-FiE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007071207480.17029@kaball-desktop> <AANLkTim48T7Y3Pq0_nS1zZ5jWH_kXrS8JceWLf-yUOM6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTinumJX1x+2AZ8vB97XRXFS3vWYArg0XJk8iiebt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19756.38211.320507.531016@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTi=NOMAfZM+XU+vS0rGKG4VXfL3dVVfETTxv_yzx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTi=N91eVzQuWaOond_mrW3cDkZjTGSM7+3PZDxQa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTinesEv5ZgQ2cXVKbx19=ox23NhC5t-U31_1Eu9M@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bruce Edge writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Xen build - Debian vs Redhat layout patch 
options"):
> I really don't mean to piss off the debian Xen guys, I'm truly
> grateful for the work they've done, but it does seem a little
> mis-targeted.  Or is there some other reason for putting the work
> into the downstream adaptation that I've missed?

Well, the LDFLAGS/CFLAGS thing is a bug in Debian which we[1] don't
plan to fix.

Ian.

[1] That's me wearing my Xen.org hat, not my Debian hat :-).

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel