|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]: minios: eliminate compile warning - use of unin
To: |
Gianni Tedesco <gianni.tedesco@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]: minios: eliminate compile warning - use of uninitialised variable |
From: |
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Jan 2011 20:28:39 +0100 |
Cc: |
Xen Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Fri, 07 Jan 2011 16:04:38 -0800 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<1294422142.12018.99.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Mail-followup-to: |
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gianni Tedesco <gianni.tedesco@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
References: |
<1294419169.12018.79.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110107165822.GX5820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1294420919.12018.89.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1294422142.12018.99.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Resent-date: |
Sat, 8 Jan 2011 01:03:27 +0100 |
Resent-from: |
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Resent-message-id: |
<20110108000327.GS5418@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Resent-to: |
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
Gianni Tedesco, le Fri 07 Jan 2011 17:42:22 +0000, a écrit :
> On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 17:21 +0000, Gianni Tedesco wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 16:58 +0000, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Gianni Tedesco, le Fri 07 Jan 2011 16:52:49 +0000, a écrit :
> > > > I'm not sure if this is a legit catch by gcc or a false positive due to
> > > > extra cleverness in gcc-4.5. Either way it causes the build to barf.
> > >
> > > It seems a false positive to me. What is the warning message?
>
> Actually looks like these are incorrect when compiled 64bit and not
> needed anyway. Following patch does the job.
They _are_ needed when you do some particular divisions: gcc will emit
references in that case.
Samuel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|