WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [xen-unstable test] 4041: regressions - FAIL

To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [xen-unstable test] 4041: regressions - FAIL
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:38:01 +0000
Cc:
Delivery-date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:38:50 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:user-agent:date :subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xIqqEYSRtpaGf4nug5n5EkQEx/FAobDQSYAGBuci7Yo=; b=x9QbaP6PArx7+4Jfunh8owprGwPnTAKeB0EPSdJvVerkxRJcV00zSw7/0BzTYAooB5 rNLeTSJvLTL2v/Kjm9UBb7Gg3t0tRmmqrWzIv6gidF6mtbNX542eiBIutKHl40wFBLk+ dv5MBwiYJX+6u80bYfr3MayIR0xWMAT2Mj5Yo=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=GxBpp2GUJ9jbeG4USUyxiF2B2gRBZb1oRIHnKBaSZGK693Wsi2QktV7wUV9FTPzeho ndHjPQsrqTsUgTQ3nF6lZcBB4z3dpyj4yH80VAUlpKu/amIuSeHzfmN8zM1IJ+fpSa/M V+GcxN/wsd0al3g/K+lYMJbwDOhmf2PfiR47w=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <19723.31705.184258.293981@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcueAGMZOkf4/SD8+0yC+MMgZmlSng==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Re: [xen-unstable test] 4041: regressions - FAIL
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.27.0.100910
On 17/12/2010 15:03, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ian Jackson writes ("[xen-unstable test] 4041: regressions - FAIL"):
>> flight 4041 xen-unstable real [real]
>> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/4041/
>> 
>> Regressions :-(
>> 
>> tests which did not succeed:
>>  test-amd64-amd64-pv           5 xen-boot               fail REGR. vs. 3001
> 
> This seems to be a genuine bug.  The dom0 kernel fails to start for
> some reason.  The last serial console message is something like this:
> 
> Dec 17 11:24:00.518681 (XEN) Dom0 has maximum 4 VCPUs
> Dec 17 11:24:00.518704 (XEN) elf_load_binary: phdr 0 at 0x00000000c1000000 ->
> 0x00000000c167b000
> Dec 17 11:24:00.533686 (XEN) elf_load_binary: phdr 1 at 0x00000000c167b000 ->
> 0x00000000c1774000
> 
> It fails every time on earwig, gall-mite, itch-mite (Intel) and passes
> every time on leaf-beetle, potato-beetle, woodlouse (AMD).

Boots for me, with my own dom0 kernel. Could be a Linux dom0 regression? If
not, will need to wait for this to be bisected to less than a 100-changeset
range.

 -- Keir

> Ian.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>