| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[PATCH 00/05] xen: events: cleanups after irq core improvements (Was: Re
|
To: |
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
[PATCH 00/05] xen: events: cleanups after irq core improvements (Was: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [tip:irq/core] x86: xen: Sanitise sparse_irq handling) |
|
From: |
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:22:16 +0100 |
|
Cc: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "mingo@xxxxxxxxxx" <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "mingo@xxxxxxx" <mingo@xxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:32:46 -0700 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<6a6702dc-7dbb-47a3-a0cf-18c8a65252fe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
Organization: |
Citrix Systems, Inc. |
|
References: |
<tip-77dff1c755c3218691e95e7e38ee14323b35dbdb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CB8EE8A.5020900@xxxxxxxx> <4CB8EF30.7060504@xxxxxxxx> <6a6702dc-7dbb-47a3-a0cf-18c8a65252fe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 01:17 +0100, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Of course the really interesting question is whether this sparse irq
> rework allows us to hang our extra per-irq information of the irq_data
> structure now, rather than having to maintain all these auxiliary
> arrays?
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 03:01 +0100, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> It should.
I'm about to followup with an initial stab at some cleanups which are
made possible by these core changes, including hanging the per-irq info
off the handler_data.
These patches are on top of recent Linus master tree plus Konrad's
swiotlb-xen tree and Stefano's PVHVM tree since the latter in particular
touches the same area.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home