| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Xen dom0 crash: "d0:v0: unhandled page fault (ec=0000)"
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 00:31 +0100, Andreas Kinzler wrote:
> On 19.10.2010 17:45, Gianni Tedesco wrote:
> > ditto, I suspected a known bug in my gcc version which broke xchg
> > because when I compiled with -O2 instead of -Os... the problem went away
> > but then something else bad happened later (I forget the details, and it
> > was too many config tweaks ago to get back to last time I had it working
> > that well)
>
> Jeremy, one user earlier reported that he found out that for him there
> seems to be a relation between kernel size and crash status. He just
> added/removed some options that could never influence the "crash status"
> (like adding/removing netfilter modules). With all the experiences here,
> is may be useful to check for code paths related to kernel size.
>
> Regards Andreas
Ah, well that certainly explains why CONFIG_KALLSYMS makes a difference.
Gianni
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home