WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/7] acpi: use indirect call to register gsi in d

To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/7] acpi: use indirect call to register gsi in different modes
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 11:41:29 +0100
Cc: "jeremy@xxxxxxxx" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx" <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "x86@xxxxxxxxxx" <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 03:41:49 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1010062047340.17015@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008301134160.2545@kaball-desktop> <1283167276-7364-4-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1010061749110.2440@kaball-desktop> <4CACB257.7060705@xxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LFD.2.00.1010062047340.17015@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> 
> > On 10/06/2010 10:00 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > Peter,
> > > I sent this patch a while back as part of the "PV on HVM: receive
> > > interrupts as xen events" series (that it is based upon Konrad's
> > > pcifront series, he sent another version to the list yesterday).
> > > 
> > > Do you think that this is a reasonble approach?
> > > 
> > > If you want to give a look at the whole series you can find it here:
> > > 
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/30/170
> > > 
> > > everything else is Xen specific stuff.
> > > 
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > 
> > 
> > On the surface it seems reasonable.
> > 
> > Thomas Gleixner has been working on greatly revamping a bunch of the x86
> > interrupt code, and this might interact with his stuff, so it would be
> > good if he could comment on it.
> > 
> > [tglx: what they're apparently working on is to redirect APIC interrupts
> > to Xen event channels so they don't have to interact with the simulated
> > memory-mapped APIC.  It's "paravirtualization light".]
> 
> I'm not touching acpi code. So that should be ok.
 
In that case would be OK for me to add an acked-by H. Peter Anvin to
this patch?


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>