| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/7] acpi: use indirect call to register gsi in d
|
To: |
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/7] acpi: use indirect call to register gsi in different modes |
|
From: |
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Thu, 7 Oct 2010 11:41:29 +0100 |
|
Cc: |
"jeremy@xxxxxxxx" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx" <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "x86@xxxxxxxxxx" <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Thu, 07 Oct 2010 03:41:49 -0700 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<alpine.LFD.2.00.1010062047340.17015@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1008301134160.2545@kaball-desktop> <1283167276-7364-4-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1010061749110.2440@kaball-desktop> <4CACB257.7060705@xxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LFD.2.00.1010062047340.17015@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) |
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > On 10/06/2010 10:00 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > Peter,
> > > I sent this patch a while back as part of the "PV on HVM: receive
> > > interrupts as xen events" series (that it is based upon Konrad's
> > > pcifront series, he sent another version to the list yesterday).
> > >
> > > Do you think that this is a reasonble approach?
> > >
> > > If you want to give a look at the whole series you can find it here:
> > >
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/30/170
> > >
> > > everything else is Xen specific stuff.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > >
> >
> > On the surface it seems reasonable.
> >
> > Thomas Gleixner has been working on greatly revamping a bunch of the x86
> > interrupt code, and this might interact with his stuff, so it would be
> > good if he could comment on it.
> >
> > [tglx: what they're apparently working on is to redirect APIC interrupts
> > to Xen event channels so they don't have to interact with the simulated
> > memory-mapped APIC. It's "paravirtualization light".]
>
> I'm not touching acpi code. So that should be ok.
In that case would be OK for me to add an acked-by H. Peter Anvin to
this patch?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home