WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Xen-unstable panic: FATAL PAGE FAULT

 Yes, you are right. I have it printted out, it is 18.
Thanks for correcting me. 
 
I am interested in your assumption on list NULL check on last mail.
How can I set up a test to verify it?
 
> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:05:50 +0100
> From: JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: tinnycloud@xxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Xen-unstable panic: FATAL PAGE FAULT
>
> >>> On 01.09.10 at 09:17, MaoXiaoyun <tinnycloud@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > As I go through the chunk merge code in free_heap_pages, one thing I'd like
> >
> > to mention is, previously, I printted out all domain pages when allocated,
> >
> > and I found the order in assgin_pages in
> > /xen-4.0.0/xen/common/page_alloc.c:1087,
> >
> > the order either be 0, or 9, and later I know that is because domain U
> > populate physmap
> >
> > 2M Bytes everytime.
> >
> >
> >
> > And here in the while s tatement, the order is compare with MAX_ORDER, which
> > is 20.
>
> Are you sure it's 20? MAX_ORDER should be 18 for x86 afaict.
>
> Jan
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel