|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL
 
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions 
- FAIL"):
> I think we should try e6b9b2cbca5093e8e38d3e314e2f6415ad951c60. This is
> the commit before e73f4955a821f850f5b88c32d12a81714523a95f which was
> fingered as bad by the xen-unstable bisect yesterday.
Shall I try that with current xen-4.0-testing tip, or with the
changeset I tried last night (pre the netif header backport) ?
It's likely to take all day so it would be nice to pick the right
combination.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 |   
 
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |