[Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/4] xen: do not suspend IPI IRQs.

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

In general the semantics of IPIs are that they are are expected to
continue functioning after dpm_suspend_noirq().

Specifically I have seen a deadlock between the callfunc IPI and the
stop machine used by xen's do_suspend() routine. If one CPU has already
called dpm_suspend_noirq() then there is a window where it can be sent
a callfunc IPI before all the other CPUs have entered stop_cpu().

If this happens then the first CPU ends up spinning in stop_cpu()
waiting for the other to rendezvous in state STOPMACHINE_PREPARE while
the other is spinning in csd_lock_wait().

Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx> # .32.x+: 517d6934: irq: rename IRQF_TIMER to 
IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx> # .32.x+
---
 drivers/xen/events.c |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c b/drivers/xen/events.c
index db8f506..28f133a 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/events.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
@@ -536,6 +536,7 @@ int bind_ipi_to_irqhandler(enum ipi_vector ipi,
        if (irq < 0)
                return irq;
 
+       irqflags |= IRQF_NO_SUSPEND;
        retval = request_irq(irq, handler, irqflags, devname, dev_id);
        if (retval != 0) {
                unbind_from_irq(irq);
-- 
1.5.6.5


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel