|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open fa
To: |
Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open failed, tap: vs. tap2: |
From: |
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:48:39 +0100 |
Cc: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dante Cinco <dantecinco@xxxxxxxxx>, Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Stodden <Daniel.Stodden@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:49:16 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<20100727062101.GL17817@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
AcstU+LhhzgLAbeJQN+pvonNeLLqBAAA9uGk |
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open failed, tap: vs. tap2: |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/12.24.0.100205 |
On 27/07/2010 07:21, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>> That sounds like a lot of fallout on xen-users.
>>> Especially for people who just want their guests to boot.
>>>
>>> Maybe the whole notation should have rather been some _optional_ blktap
>>> = {1|2} cfg key, only for those who actually care?
>>
>> FWIW, I completely agree with this.
>>
>
> Yeah, especially when blktap2 is the only available on in pvops dom0 kernels..
> All the users have tap:something in their cfgfiles currently..
Well the patch to make the distinction is currently in xen-unstable and
xen-4.0. Should it be reverted from one or both? Actually it is up to IanJ
or Stefano to decide on that now.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open failed, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open failed, Daniel Stodden
- Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open failed, Dante Cinco
- Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open failed, Daniel Stodden
- Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open failed, Dante Cinco
- Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open failed, Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open failed, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open failed, Daniel Stodden
- Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open failed, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open failed, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open failed, tap: vs. tap2:, Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open failed, tap: vs. tap2:,
Keir Fraser <=
|
|
|
|
|