|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0	open fa
 
| 
To:  | 
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Subject:  | 
Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0	open failed, tap: vs. tap2: | 
 
| 
From:  | 
Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Date:  | 
Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:21:01 +0300 | 
 
| 
Cc:  | 
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>,	Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Daniel Stodden <daniel.stodden@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Dante Cinco <dantecinco@xxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Delivery-date:  | 
Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:21:39 -0700 | 
 
| 
Envelope-to:  | 
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
In-reply-to:  | 
<1280140584.5872.6977.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
List-help:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> | 
 
| 
List-id:  | 
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-post:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-subscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> | 
 
| 
List-unsubscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> | 
 
| 
References:  | 
<C86EFE38.1B5DA%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<1280050032.4626.1282.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<1280140584.5872.6977.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Sender:  | 
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
User-agent:  | 
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) | 
 
 
 
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:36:24AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 10:27 +0100, Daniel Stodden wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 03:07 -0400, Keir Fraser wrote:
> > > On 22/07/2010 22:10, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > >> You got it right with tap2 (instead of tap). That's the key.
> > > >> 
> > > >> So with Xen 4.0.0 and 2.6.32.14 it's: disk = [
> > > >> 'tap:tapdisk:vhd:/mnt/win2008sp2.vhd,xvda:sda1,w' ]
> > > >> 
> > > >> and with Xen 4.0.1-rc4 and 2.6.32.16 it's: disk = [
> > > >> 'tap2:tapdisk:vhd:/mnt/win2008sp2.vhd,xvda:sda1,w' ]
> > > >> 
> > > >> Very subtle change but makes a world of difference. My Windows 2008
> > > >> domU is now booting from a VHD file.
> > > >> 
> > > > 
> > > > Uhm.. is this change intentional?
> > > 
> > > xen-unstable:21338 and xen-4.0-testing:21140. So yes.
> > 
> > That sounds like a lot of fallout on xen-users.
> > Especially for people who just want their guests to boot.
> > 
> > Maybe the whole notation should have rather been some _optional_ blktap
> > = {1|2} cfg key, only for those who actually care?
> 
> FWIW, I completely agree with this.
> 
Yeah, especially when blktap2 is the only available on in pvops dom0 kernels..
All the users have tap:something in their cfgfiles currently..
-- Pasi
> > 
> > [As much as the whole disk notation should probably always just have
> > been <type>:<path>, with a separately configurable <type> -> <backend>
> > mapping for people who want to override backend choices (such
> > file->loopback vs file->aio).]
> > 
> > I guess the latter cannot be fixed. But maybe the former?
> > 
> > Daniel
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open	failed, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open	failed, Dante Cinco
- Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0	open 	failed, Daniel Stodden
 - Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open	failed, Dante Cinco
 - Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0	open 	failed, Daniel Stodden
 - Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open	failed, Dante Cinco
 - Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0	open failed, Pasi Kärkkäinen
 - Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open	failed, Keir Fraser
 - Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0	open failed, Daniel Stodden
 - Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open	failed, Keir Fraser
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0	open failed, Ian Campbell
 - Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0	open failed, tap: vs. tap2:,
Pasi Kärkkäinen <=
 - Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open	failed, tap: vs. tap2:, Keir Fraser
 
  
   
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |