| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] add LSB header to xen-watchdog runlevel script [
Olaf Hering writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] add LSB header to xen-watchdog
runlevel script"):
> On Fri, Jul 23, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Olaf Hering writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] add LSB header to xen-watchdog
> > runlevel script"):
> > > This tells the insserv program to create a symlink in the specified
> > > runlevels. xdm for example has only '5', because X11 is only supposed to
> > > be started in runlevel 5.
> >
> > Yes, but the question is: do we want to start the watchdog by
> > default ? Previously we didn't.
>
> Thats up to the packager of the binary package.
> Or do you mean there should be no runlevel script in the first place?
I meant: adding these lines would seem to be likely to cause some
systems to automatically start the watchdog when previously they would
not have done so. I wanted to know whether that was a good idea.
Tim Deegan writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] add LSB header to xen-watchdog
runlevel script"):
> At 17:45 +0100 on 23 Jul (1279907152), Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I don't think it's tested in our automatic tests. Do other people
> > test and use it ?
>
> XenServer uses it as part of its high-availability mechanism.
That's good enough for me. I'll apply Olaf's patch.
Thanks,
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home