 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] add LSB header to xen-watchdog runlevel script
| To: | Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] add LSB header to xen-watchdog runlevel script |
| From: | Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:43:17 +0200 |
| Cc: | "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:43:57 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1279910601; l=555; s=domk; d=aepfle.de; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Subject:Cc:To:From: Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=CJUAItNOJcQIwy2hkZmOJ3EAxI4=; b=l90RBdVMvrXirkaKgmtrKl+O7urcXN2NRUukXBE0vcu5ARpK0v6oVdebPuZLRkXDA7A wbZtTmvyc052xXIiiKsBwudizj9QfcXR8EnqEwL1kPjJpmVHQqHSArltlZAsLU3lgMGec twq4aHFUu8mLraXPVi2Jd5lNaCGjYu/hrLI= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <19529.55727.859057.248861@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <20100723121324.GB3540@xxxxxxxxx> <19529.51008.134045.602693@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100723173620.GA7603@xxxxxxxxx> <19529.55727.859057.248861@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Fri, Jul 23, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Olaf Hering writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] add LSB header to xen-watchdog
> runlevel script"):
> > This tells the insserv program to create a symlink in the specified
> > runlevels. xdm for example has only '5', because X11 is only supposed to
> > be started in runlevel 5.
>
> Yes, but the question is: do we want to start the watchdog by
> default ? Previously we didn't.
Thats up to the packager of the binary package.
Or do you mean there should be no runlevel script in the first place?
Olaf
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] remove Default-Enabled from LSB header, Olaf Hering |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] correct order of linker options to avoid link errors with recent toolchains, Olaf Hering |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] add LSB header to xen-watchdog runlevel script, Ian Jackson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] add LSB header to xen-watchdog runlevel script [and 1 more messages], Ian Jackson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
