WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: xenfs: implement O_NONBLOCK for /proc/xen/xenbus

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: xenfs: implement O_NONBLOCK for /proc/xen/xenbus
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:33:10 +0200
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 02:34:05 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+1FqHmSQtyfB9LZPlzX3+vYMabJO689O82+k0bMUJJA=; b=VSyO/QQQaoOCsByHAjFxriof/L+C8aA6++NsI1GSZ1a252hNyP718VqSp1WmKByktb xn5AQtNtOg4T8C3IDtbtWB8ZpoFGlinioPRRAdob7JivG4+D8sl4wvboG5JVFI95HvDd q6yLATs87nTwNsvT6/bMFNEFRUdGLxyRFosHM=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=YX0+/N2YJwc9UzEuRhw0htR1fhiVPvy9OBkw+JWnv3Uessxvz7Jia+U0xRhyctFen+ J+jD9b2jljEJpEWQIz2sL7LOY01iBfoRIKlpC5/oZVggYEyqpUCUJMZFUb96MvcYoFpr i5eSuMkx9BELWCMI4mvrylUpLMmTht0rjcWLc=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4C2DCD76.8070101@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <i001b0$2e8$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C262665.1080404@xxxxxxxx> <4C2854FD.1050109@xxxxxxxxxx> <4C2DCD76.8070101@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100621 Fedora/3.0.5-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.5
On 07/02/2010 01:28 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 06/28/2010 09:53 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 06/26/2010 06:10 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
On 06/24/2010 05:32 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Trivial patch. Tested only in the pvops version.

What user do you have for this?

It was reported by internal QE without many details, likely it was found
by code inspection or some automated tool. I didn't ask because the
patch was easy enough, but I can get more information if you care.

It was found by a test (proc01) in LTP to read every entry of the procfs.

ping?  It's not in linux-2.6.18.hg either.

Paolo

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>