|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Re: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on
To: |
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Re: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up |
From: |
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:30:15 +0100 |
Cc: |
"Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, "Zhang, Jianwu" <jianwu.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Xu, Jiajun" <jiajun.xu@xxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Mon, 19 Jul 2010 05:30:58 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<C86A028E.1AF9E%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
AcsnPJZh26QjCjEITnG3FArGqLuJvQAAL+nYAAAzabw= |
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Re: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/12.24.0.100205 |
On 19/07/2010 13:24, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Ah, so it does. I assumed it was the kernel because that's all that
>> changed on my test box since I last tested this stuff. I'm using the C
>> xenstored and its code looks like it should work fine with the page
>> getting zeroed under its feet. I'll dig further.
>
> Thanks. The revised patch might be acceptable, but if possible we're better
> off relying on undocumented xenstored behaviour than domU frontend behaviour
> since the former we have full control over (albeit we now have two daemons
> to consider). Really nice would be some kind of explicit reset command or
> protocol, but in this context since there are no watches or pending requests
> or anything, I guess whacking the xenstore page is sufficient engineering
> effort.
And, yes, I agree it looks like the existing code should just work. The C
xenstored, at least, doesn't cache ring indexes.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Re: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up, (continued)
- [Xen-devel] Re: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up, Tim Deegan
- [Xen-devel] Re: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up, Tim Deegan
- [Xen-devel] RE: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up, Zhang, Yang Z
- [Xen-devel] Re: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up, Tim Deegan
- [Xen-devel] RE: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up, Zhang, Yang Z
- [Xen-devel] Re: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up, Tim Deegan
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up, Tim Deegan
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Re: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Re: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up, Tim Deegan
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Re: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Re: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up,
Keir Fraser <=
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] v2 (Re: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up), Tim Deegan
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] v2 (Re: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up), Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] v2 (Re: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up), Zhang, Jianwu
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] v2 (Re: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up), Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] v2 (Re: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up), Tim Deegan
|
|
|
|
|