WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up

At 16:30 +0100 on 15 Jul (1279211440), Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> ok, I get it. Will you work on this issue ? it has block our nightly
> test. Hope will be fixed as soon as possible.

Yes, I am still looking into it.  I think the address of the table is
not causing it, though, so it might take some time to find the real
cause.

Cheers,

Tim.

> best regards
> yang
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Deegan [mailto:Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 11:20 PM
> To: Zhang, Yang Z
> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhang, Jianwu; Xu, Jiajun
> Subject: Re: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up
> 
> At 16:14 +0100 on 15 Jul (1279210449), Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> > Is type 11 data structure cover 0xEB180 ? where is the start address
> > of type 11 structure? and the max length ?
> 
> No, the type-11 table is in the middle of the other SMBIOS tables.  The
> SMBIOS tables cover 0xEB000 -- 0xEB171 before my patch; after the patch
> they go a little further.  Extending them to cover 0xEB000 -- 0xEB187 
> (just by making existing strings a little longer, not adding a type-11
> table) makes CentOS 5.5 x64 hang up on boot.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Tim.
> 
> > 
> > best regards
> > yang
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tim Deegan [mailto:Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> > Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 8:23 PM
> > To: Zhang, Yang Z
> > Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhang, Jianwu; Xu, Jiajun
> > Subject: Re: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up
> > 
> > At 10:48 +0100 on 15 Jul (1279190937), Tim Deegan wrote:
> > > At 09:07 +0100 on 15 Jul (1279184841), Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> > > >          In our recently nightly test, we find guest will cost more
> > > > time to boot up. After our investigation, we find that for rhel5u3 and
> > > > rh5u5 guest it will stop at ?start udev ? for long time when boot
> > > > up. And we find cs:21768 will cause this issue. Do you meet the same
> > > > problem?
> > > 
> > > Nope, works fine for me[tm].  RHEL 5.5 stops at start_udev for about 5
> > > seconds, but that's not unusual.  I'll try RHEL 5.3.
> > 
> > I've reproduced this slowdown on CentOS 5.5 x64.  It seems to be caused
> > by the size of the SMBIOS tables - reverting the part of this cset that
> > adds a type 11 object fixes the boot time; then just making some of the
> > other SMBIOS strings longer causes it to hang again. I wonder whether
> > we're running into some other BIOS datastructure around 0xEB180
> > 
> > Tim.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Principal Software Engineer, XenServer Engineering
> > Citrix Systems UK Ltd.  (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG)
> 
> -- 
> Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Principal Software Engineer, XenServer Engineering
> Citrix Systems UK Ltd.  (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG)

-- 
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Principal Software Engineer, XenServer Engineering
Citrix Systems UK Ltd.  (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG)

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>