WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re: blktap2 problem with pvops kernel 2.6.32.13

To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re: blktap2 problem with pvops kernel 2.6.32.13 and xen 4.0-rc1
From: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 15:28:40 +0200
Cc: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, eXeC001er <execooler@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sun, 30 May 2010 06:29:57 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C8281794.164E4%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Eikelenboom IT services
References: <AANLkTinib_kJIWrdSR_d5QqxpzjTfnGmNp23Tlyywhj8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C8281794.164E4%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Kind of strange, one would say with

dom0._waitForDeviceUUID which calls waitForDevice, the device should be present 
and accessible by the time it arrives at the try.

So I think, one or the other way a device can be reported as available, when 
it's not ...
A sleep doesn't seem a appropriate solution.

--
Sander



Sunday, May 30, 2010, 2:24:36 PM, you wrote:

> Needs a patch description and a signed-off-by line.

>  -- Keir

> On 30/05/2010 13:21, "eXeC001er" <execooler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> My python-experience is small, but i tied to rewrite.
>> New in attach.
>> 
>> 2010/5/30 Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> On 30/05/2010 11:37, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 02:02:06PM +0400, eXeC001er wrote:
>>>>>    I have already sent a patch 1 weak ago. (blktap2_control_func.patch)
>>>>>    repeat in attach.
>>>>>    Thanks.
>>>> 
>>>> Ok, thanks.
>>>> 
>>>> Keir: I guess this is not committed yet?
>>> 
>>> I'm not too happy about the sleep(5). I guess if there's no better solution
>>> coming up I should just whack this patch in?
>>> 
>>>  -- Keir
>>> 
>>>> -- Pasi
>>>> 
>>>>>    2010/5/30 Pasi Kärkkäinen <[1]pasik@xxxxxx>
>>>>> 
>>>>>      On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 11:17:51AM +0400, eXeC001er wrote:
>>>>>>      I've attempted to install Nexenta Core 3 image under Xen 4.0
>>>>>      (2.6.32.13
>>>>>>      pvops) on top of F13. Sample nexenta3.cfg profile contains 4
>>>>>      lines like
>>>>>>      this:-
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      disk=['tat:tapdisk:vhd:/path/../disk.img,xvda,w'] ( from sample)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      It generates message
>>>>>>      Â File 'vhd:/path/.../disk.img' doesn't exist.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      Boris.
>>>>>>      P.S. It was already in one of the threads @xen-users.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    This bug in "def _parse_uname(uname):"
>>>>>      (tools/python/xen/util/blkif.py)
>>>>>>    (taptype, fn) = fn.split(":", 1) >>>>>>Â (taptype, fn) =
>>>>>      fn.split(":",
>>>>>>    2)[1:3]
>>>>> 
>>>>>      Can you send a proper patch, as unified diff (diff -u), with a
>>>>>      Signed-off-by line?
>>>>>      -- Pasi
>>>>> 
>>>>> References
>>>>> 
>>>>>    Visible links
>>>>>    1. mailto:pasik@xxxxxx
>>>> 
>>>>> diff -r d0420ab97345 tools/python/xen/util/blkif.py
>>>>> --- a/tools/python/xen/util/blkif.py Fri May 21 16:21:39 2010 +0100
>>>>> +++ b/tools/python/xen/util/blkif.py Sat May 22 01:21:15 2010 +0400
>>>>> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
>>>>>                  fn = "/dev/%s" %(fn,)
>>>>> 
>>>>>          if typ in ("tap", "tap2"):
>>>>> -            (taptype, fn) = fn.split(":", 1)
>>>>> +            (taptype, fn) = fn.split(":", 2)[1:]
>>>>>      return (fn, taptype)
>>>>> 
>>>>>  def blkdev_uname_to_file(uname):
>>>>> diff -r d0420ab97345 tools/python/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py
>>>>> --- a/tools/python/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py Fri May 21 16:21:39 2010
>>>>> +0100
>>>>> +++ b/tools/python/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py Sat May 22 01:21:15 2010
>>>>> +0400
>>>>> @@ -3292,6 +3292,7 @@
>>>>>                  fn = BOOTLOADER_LOOPBACK_DEVICE
>>>>> 
>>>>>              try:
>>>>> +                time.sleep(5)
>>>>>                  blcfg = bootloader(blexec, fn, self, False,
>>>>>                                     bootloader_args, kernel, ramdisk, 
>>>>> args)
>>>>>              finally:
>>>>> @@ -3299,7 +3300,7 @@
>>>>>                      log.info <http://log.info> ("Unmounting %s from %s." 
>>>>> %
>>>>>                               (fn, BOOTLOADER_LOOPBACK_DEVICE))
>>>>> 
>>>>> -                    dom0.destroyDevice('tap', BOOTLOADER_LOOPBACK_DEVICE)
>>>>> +                    dom0.destroyDevice(devtype,
>>>>> BOOTLOADER_LOOPBACK_DEVICE)
>>>>> 
>>>>>              if blcfg is None:
>>>>>                  msg = "Had a bootloader specified, but can't find disk"
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 







-- 
Best regards,
 Sander                            mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>