|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC
On 26/05/2010 18:39, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> But what we do in 4.0 is whack all the TSCs at boot time... How is this
>> any different?
>
> I don't think we do that anymore, at least not when the
> underlying machine is deemed to have a stable TSC
> (Invariant TSC or constant/nonstop TSC with max_cstate<3).
Hm, yep, looks like we skip it when we detect 'reliable tscs'. So on modern
x86 that means we do not modify TSCs in Xen ever.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Ian Pratt
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Jiang, Yunhong
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Jiang, Yunhong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Jiang, Yunhong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC, Jiang, Yunhong
|
|
|
|
|