On 05/09/2010 11:05 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> diff -r bbf009817ffb tools/libxl/libxl.c
>> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl.c Fri May 07 19:22:28 2010 +0100
>> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl.c Fri May 07 14:57:00 2010 -0700
>> @@ -169,7 +169,8 @@
>>
>> xs_write(ctx->xsh, t, libxl_sprintf(ctx, "%s/uuid", vm_path),
>> uuid_string, strlen(uuid_string));
>> xs_write(ctx->xsh, t, libxl_sprintf(ctx, "%s/name", vm_path),
>> info->name, strlen(info->name));
>> - xs_write(ctx->xsh, t, libxl_sprintf(ctx, "%s/pool_name",
>> vm_path), info->poolname, strlen(info->poolname));
>> + if (info->poolname)
>> + xs_write(ctx->xsh, t, libxl_sprintf(ctx, "%s/pool_name",
>> vm_path), info->poolname, strlen(info->poolname));
>>
>> libxl_xs_writev(ctx, t, dom_path, info->xsdata);
>> libxl_xs_writev(ctx, t, libxl_sprintf(ctx, "%s/platform",
>> dom_path), info->platformdata);
>>
>> fixes it for me.
>
>
> You seem to have specified a not existing cpupool.
> The solution should not be to ignore this, but to do a proper test on the
> pool parameter.
> Attached patch does this.
I'm not using cpupools. My config makes no mention of "pool" at all.
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home