Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6 of 6] PV on HVM suspend\resume

On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 04/25/2010 04:25 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >> This won't compile with CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled, because out_destroy_sm
> >> is missing below.
> >>
> >>     
> >  
> > Now it is fixed,
> 
> Did you push out the fix (ideally as a new delta changeset on top of the
> previous ones, rather than rebaseing them).
> 

Yes but this time I rebased them; next time I'll keep the fix separated.

> 
> >  however I tried suspend/resume with CONFIG_PREEMPT
> > enabled and the kernel seems to hang at resume time; I wonder if it
> > works for pv guests since the suspend/resume code is similiar...
> >   
> 
> I think Pasi and IanC tested it quite a bit not too long ago, but its
> possible they didn't test preempt kernels (and it wouldn't surprise me
> at all if preempt breaks things).
> 

all right, more debugging required here...

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

[Xen-devel] Xen 3.0.3 tap:aio disk image fails on RAID5/XFS filesystem, Steven Haigh

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] Event channel performance optimize, Keir Fraser

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6 of 6] PV on HVM suspend\resume, Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6 of 6] PV on HVM suspend\resume, Pasi Kärkkäinen

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]