On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 11:43 -0400, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
> I don't believe we ever did that, with seems wrong indeed. Thanks for
> pointing it out.
>
> Eric, any chance you can move the tsc_mode call to build_pre (which is
> called by pv and hvm) and refresh the patch ?
Here is the new patch including these changes.
Acked-by: Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl.h b/tools/libxl/libxl.h
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl.h
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl.h
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ typedef struct {
int vpt_align;
int max_vcpus;
int cur_vcpus;
+ int tsc_mode;
uint32_t max_memkb;
uint32_t target_memkb;
uint32_t video_memkb;
diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ int build_pre(struct libxl_ctx *ctx, uin
xc_domain_set_memmap_limit(ctx->xch, domid,
(info->hvm) ? info->max_memkb :
(info->max_memkb + info->u.pv.slack_memkb));
+ xc_domain_set_tsc_info(ctx->xch, domid, info->tsc_mode, 0, 0, 0);
if (info->hvm) {
unsigned long shadow;
diff --git a/tools/libxl/xl.c b/tools/libxl/xl.c
--- a/tools/libxl/xl.c
+++ b/tools/libxl/xl.c
@@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ static void printf_info(libxl_domain_cre
printf("hpet: %d\n", b_info->hpet);
printf("vpt_align: %d\n", b_info->vpt_align);
printf("max_vcpus: %d\n", b_info->max_vcpus);
+ printf("tsc_mode: %d\n", b_info->tsc_mode);
printf("max_memkb: %d\n", b_info->max_memkb);
printf("target_memkb: %d\n", b_info->target_memkb);
printf("kernel: %s\n", b_info->kernel);
@@ -382,6 +383,9 @@ static void parse_config_file(const char
b_info->target_memkb = b_info->max_memkb;
}
+ if (!xlu_cfg_get_long(config, "tsc_mode", &l))
+ b_info->tsc_mode = l;
+
if (!xlu_cfg_get_long (config, "shadow_memory", &l))
b_info->shadow_memkb = l * 1024;
--
Eric Chanudet
XenClient Team
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home