>>> On 3/11/2010 at 4:44 PM, in message <4B996436.1000600@xxxxxxxx>, Jeremy
Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/11/2010 12:15 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 01:39:23PM -0700, Ky Srinivasan wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> On 3/9/2010 at 3:35 PM, in message<20100309203557.GJ1878@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>>>>> Pasi
>>>>>>
>>> Kärkkäinen<pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 01:31:17PM -0700, Ky Srinivasan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 3/9/2010 at 3:15 PM, in
>>>>>>>> message<20100309201529.GH1878@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Pasi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> Kärkkäinen<pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 12:56:11PM -0700, Ky Srinivasan wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The attached patch supports dynamic resizing of vbds.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nice! Did you also implement the xm/xend side of resizing?
>>>>>>
>>>>> My goal was to not have the end-user do anything other than what
>>>>> was minimally required to resizing the device on the host side.
>>>>> Once the device is resized on the host side, this capacity change
>>>>> is propagated to the guest without having to invoke any xm command.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Oh, even better!
>>>> What version of the kernel did you test with? 2.6.27?
>>>>
>>> I tested this on 2.6.32. The patches should apply to earlier kernels
>>> without
> too much trouble.
>>>
>>>
>> Great!
>>
>> Jeremy: Hopefully you can add this patch to your tree.
>>
>
> It applied fairly cleanly, but I haven't tested it yet. Ky, by 2.6.32 I
> assume I mean your one, not pvops? (Because your patch is touching
> blkfront in the wrong place.)
Yes. This patch was against our sles11 sp1.
Regards,
K. Y
>
> J
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home