Re: [Xen-devel][PATCH]: Support dynamic resizing of vbds

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>]

On 03/11/2010 12:15 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 01:39:23PM -0700, Ky Srinivasan wrote:
>    
> >      
> > > > > On 3/9/2010 at  3:35 PM, in message<20100309203557.GJ1878@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Pasi
> > > > >            
> > Kärkkäinen<pasik@xxxxxx>  wrote:
> >      
> > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 01:31:17PM -0700, Ky Srinivasan wrote:
> > >        
> > > >          
> > > > > > > On 3/9/2010 at  3:15 PM, in message<20100309201529.GH1878@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Pasi
> > > > > > >                
> > > > Kärkkäinen<pasik@xxxxxx>  wrote:
> > > >          
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 12:56:11PM -0700, Ky Srinivasan wrote:
> > > > >            
> > > > > > The attached patch supports dynamic resizing of vbds.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >              
> > > > > Nice! Did you also implement the xm/xend side of resizing?
> > > > >            
> > > > My goal was to not have the end-user do anything other than what
> > > > was minimally required to  resizing the device on the host side.
> > > > Once the device is resized on the host side, this capacity change
> > > > is propagated to the guest without having to invoke any xm command.
> > > >
> > > >          
> > > Oh, even better!
> > > What version of the kernel did you test with? 2.6.27?
> > >        
> > I tested this on 2.6.32. The patches should apply to earlier kernels without 
> > too much trouble.
> >
> >      
> Great!
>
> Jeremy: Hopefully you can add this patch to your tree.
>    
It applied fairly cleanly, but I haven't tested it yet.  Ky, by 2.6.32 I 
assume I mean your one, not pvops? (Because your patch is touching 
blkfront in the wrong place.)
    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel