WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] A clocksource question

To: Joanna Rutkowska <joanna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] A clocksource question
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 14:07:17 +0200
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:07:49 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4B962BD1.3060307@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C7BBD867.C7CD%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B9628F3.5060101@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B962BD1.3060307@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 12:06:57PM +0100, Joanna Rutkowska wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 11:54 AM, Joanna Rutkowska wrote:
> > On 03/09/2010 11:50 AM, Keir Fraser wrote:
> >> On 09/03/2010 10:47, "Joanna Rutkowska" <joanna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Interestingly the above problem didn't seem to affect the Dom0 kernel
> >>> based on xen/stable-2.6.32. Unfortunately I assume I'm no longer able to
> >>> run this kernel when using Xen 3.4.2.
> >>
> >> You could run the 3.4.3 release candidates?
> >>
> > Let's just say that after my recent experience with a 4.0.0 release
> > candidate, I decided to use a stable version (or at least for the
> > hypervisor) for now :) I really want to use on a production system.
> > 
> > Perhaps you would say that in that case I should not be using a pvops0
> > kernel at all? But what would be a good alternative with all reasonable
> > hardware support then?
> > 
> ...plus the xen/stable-2.6/.32 doesn't have the pciback, which I happen
> to need in Dom0...
> 

Your options are listed here:
http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenDom0Kernels

-- Pasi


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel