This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] A clocksource question

To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] A clocksource question
From: Joanna Rutkowska <joanna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:06:57 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:07:52 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=9xh7yNGDgT+EINk7OD5scB2dUCU=; b=omy6rcIcoGTXhZAHokrSXc4EPFfJcBiuI+Cf/asDPiu9Ku+duvZFWgSx9Rat90psZS8WVhrQNjJ10Rrx8Z6Svypl1lntUQNhw9pxaZ01mNxfHYxBUALC/59L5mKs84Q3Gvj0lEYh0tkepN9FC882Bxm+tO0VmVqbD4sdP2sBuu4=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4B9628F3.5060101@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C7BBD867.C7CD%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B9628F3.5060101@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv: Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.3
On 03/09/2010 11:54 AM, Joanna Rutkowska wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 11:50 AM, Keir Fraser wrote:
>> On 09/03/2010 10:47, "Joanna Rutkowska" <joanna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>> Interestingly the above problem didn't seem to affect the Dom0 kernel
>>> based on xen/stable-2.6.32. Unfortunately I assume I'm no longer able to
>>> run this kernel when using Xen 3.4.2.
>> You could run the 3.4.3 release candidates?
> Let's just say that after my recent experience with a 4.0.0 release
> candidate, I decided to use a stable version (or at least for the
> hypervisor) for now :) I really want to use on a production system.
> Perhaps you would say that in that case I should not be using a pvops0
> kernel at all? But what would be a good alternative with all reasonable
> hardware support then?
...plus the xen/stable-2.6/.32 doesn't have the pciback, which I happen
to need in Dom0...


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Xen-devel mailing list