Re: [Xen-devel] Fourth RC for Xen 4.0.0 (was Re: Third release c

To:	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] Fourth RC for Xen 4.0.0 (was Re: Third release candidiate for Xen 4.0.0)
From:	Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 20 Feb 2010 12:46:36 -0800 (PST)
Cc:	"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Sat, 20 Feb 2010 12:47:26 -0800
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1266698796; bh=qYY46dms03zLK2JQkFF8h6OVTAv+JzHR+ditAwoHJLY=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mazYi6OHeww7r7Xq1SuIYFgQZxJXT8uxyHk2kmXdhvEj3KoPPfX/NbgBmti9WkhPXB3BZRm9g601PsP8uP0A1QZK1XVDiDnSdhg5/EtFQ5yzVrEJIwBYdVuBhZ8exu8CHZ0myO5PVf4bXN7HeqZqLHxHaiXDvvuljjLFM8fkr34=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=wpT2w3HPuns8JWJyjlbMQFcmt+4t5/Mduf+ZSmDYdxZiheiyIWuGT8ppEqnsoBFkyw6kYhU1AomdkKyvRICyeDntzj48uRHb4AFdOawCzcDS5TK43oOHc/6kxZqnanJyZSWuF1VIQuZascqbHcLUY/Hj4qYF0ydpwoSLtZYHtX8=;
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20100220140253.GG2761@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> For testing I was running PV guests using virt-manager. The host is Fedora 12.
> No regressions found in my (pretty quick) testing compared to Xen 3.4.x.

1. Could you post ?
# virsh version
2. Does "virsh create" work properly in your environment ?

Same Xen 4-rc4 & 2.6.32 pvops on top of Ubuntu 9.10 Server ( Libvirt 0.7.0)
allows virt-install to perform F12 & CentOS 5.4 PV DomUs installs with no problems.
Virsh define & virsh start <DomName> also work OK.
However , virsh create fails to create new Domain.
Xen API been used is 3.0.1 per "virh version" report.
I believe Xen driver for Libvirt in my case doesn't communicate properly with "xend"

Boris.

--- On Sat, 2/20/10, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:

From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Fourth RC for Xen 4.0.0 (was Re: Third release candidiate for Xen 4.0.0)
To: "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Saturday, February 20, 2010, 9:02 AM

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 06:14:45PM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 16/02/2010 11:58, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > The third RC is tagged as 4.0.0-rc3 in
> > http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg -- please test!
>
> And now there is a tag for 4.0.0-rc4, which fixes the qemu build.
>

Xen 4.0.0 rc4 (x86_64) builds, boots and works OK for me, with the latest
x86_64 Linux 2.6.31.6 pv_ops dom0 kernel from xen/master,
on Supermicro Intel Core2 Quad hardware.

For testing I was running PV guests using virt-manager. The host is Fedora 12.
No regressions found in my (pretty quick) testing compared to Xen 3.4.x.

-- Pasi

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Fourth RC for Xen 4.0.0 (was Re: Third release candidiat